Search: water with added aroma

Barley is steeped according to a defined scheme, and the absorption of the steeping liquor by the kernels at defined times is determined by calculating the moisture content. The moisture content after 72 h steeping time is used to assess the absorption of steeping liquor or the capacity for water imbibition in barley.

This simple descriptive analysis provides a method for articulately communicating sensory attributes. The method can be utilized to formulate a list of attributes for the profile test. The list of attributes must then be statistically corroborated and reference samples employed to ensure that all of the testers identify the same reference substance for each of the given attributes (e.g., rancid butter, sweaty = reference substance butyric acid).

A joint project in 2005 was organized by industry partners Hopsteiner, HVG and Johann Barth & Sohn along with the Central Marketing Organization of the German Agricultural Industries (CMA) and became known as the CMA scheme. This objective of this tasting scheme is to determine hop-related factors influencing the sensory analysis of beer.

First of all, the intensity and quality of the hop aroma and flavor are evaluated in their entirety according to a ten-point scale with 0 as unpleasant and 10 as very good/very pleasant. Then, the intensities of individual characteristics are also ranked on a ten-point scale, with 0 as imperceptible and 10 as very intense. For beer with a pronounced hop aroma, the following descriptors have become established in recent decades: fruity, floral, citrus, green-grassy and hop-spicy. These are available for specific training in the evaluation of hop oil fractions. Distinctive aromas detected by tasters can be described in the space provided. In order to characterize the overall impact of the hops, the bitterness is also evaluated sensorially. Both the intensity and the quality/harmony are evaluated on a ten-point scale, with 0 rated as completely lacking balance and 10 as very harmonious.

The mean values of the intensity of the hop aroma and flavor as well as the intensity of the bitterness are given on the score sheet (i.e., the sum of the scores divided by the number of tasters). The mean value of each aroma characteristic is reproduced as a spider diagram. The individual values should be checked for outliers prior to the calculating the mean. Since quality assessments are subjective by nature, the mean values can only be of limited value. However, they can be beneficial in determining whether any distinctive aroma or flavor characteristics were judged by the majority to be pleasant or unpleasant. The same applies to assessing the quality of the bitterness. 

The time required to develop a product – from conception to launch on the market – is steadily shrinking. Since recipes are also becoming ever more complex and a wide range of different types of packaging are now employed, forced stability tests have become absolutely essential, in order to establish a realistic indication of a product’s shelf-life.

Inferences about the shelf life of a product can only be made if the entire beverage concept is taken into consideration, such as the recipe, filling technology, packaging and distribution.

The most important stress factors in the aging process are heat, light and oxygen.

PET bottles have become a popular form of packaging for non-alcoholic beverages, and their permeability to gas, most especially oxygen, is therefore a critical parameter in the aging process.

The testing process described below operates, of course, on the assumption that the chemical reactions in the aging process are subject to the same mechanisms, whether they occur at temperatures typical for beverage storage or at somewhat elevated temperatures, and that they follow a linear relationship dependent on temperature. The same applies to forced photochemical reactions and to reactions brought about by an increase in the partial pressure of oxygen on the beverage. To verify results from forced testing, they can be compared and correlated to results from real-time tests on the same product.

The aroma compounds in hops are driven out through steam distillation and are captured in a special apparatus. The determination is carried out through reading the volume transferred into the apparatus.

Kaltner (2000) developed a score sheet for assessing beers with a strong hop flavor, which on one hand is based on the DLG quality assessment of beer (refer to S.590.53.700 Einzelprobenprüfung zur Qualitätskontrolle von Bier - DLG-Prüfschema für Bier). The criteria aroma, flavor, fullness, liveliness and bitterness are evaluated using a five-point scale in half-point steps, where 5 denotes a pure attribute and 1 indicates major faults. On the other hand, the quality and distinction of the hop aroma and bitterness are assessed. The aroma and flavor of the hop impression are also distinguished. The evaluation is also based on a five-point scale with an intensity of 5 corresponding to the attribute “perfume-like” and 1 to “not perceptible”. Under “quality of the hop aroma” a score of 5 is considered “pleasant” and 1 “unpleasant”. Additionally, the score sheet provides space for describing the sensory impression of the appeal of a particular hop note. The intensity of the bitterness is also evaluated on a five-point scale, and in this case, 5 denotes a very strong impression, and 1 a very weak one.

The appeal of the bitterness has been plotted on a graph and is expressed using the following terms:

• rapidly diminishing (low intensity)

• fine, harmonious (moderate intensity and pleasantly lingering)

• hard (high intensity and fleeting)

• lingering (high intensity and persistently lingering)